Nettet(Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857, 865.) Further, officers may briefly detain others present in a residence during a probation search to ascertain identity, relationship to … NettetCelis (2004) 33 Cal.4th 667, 678 [“mere inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch” is insufficient]. 8 (2nd Cir. 2004) 376 F.3d 112, 116. 9 See People v. Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.Ap.4th 857, 866 [“mere abstract theoretical possibility” of danger is …
5.1: Principles of Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion
NettetUnder the facts known to them, the police could conduct a protective sweep of a house which a probationer with a search condition had identified as her residence and which they verified with county records. Although she could not enter the house the day before because it was locked, she had pointed through the window… Nettet30. aug. 2024 · Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857, 864) or by an officer "left behind to secure the premises while a warrant to search those premises is obtained" (U.S. v. … the americanese wall cartoon
AB109 CRT TEST Flashcards Quizlet
Nettet27. sep. 2024 · Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857, 863 (Ledesma).) The standard is “reasonable suspicion”: “[T]here must be articulable facts which, taken together with the rational inferences from those facts, would warrant a reasonably prudent officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the arrest … Nettet15. des. 2024 · Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857, 866 ["information known to the investigating officers, filtered through the lens of their experience and training, justified the protective sweep undertaken"].) The calm manner in which the people exited the house, and their assurances that no one remained inside does not change our analysis. Nettet(Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857.) Example: Police went to a probationer's residence to conduct a probation search. Cotenant, who appeared to be under the … the gap fashion